https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421362 The court quashed Criminal Complaint No. 6543 of 2015 as the petitioners demonstrated payment within the notice period, nullifying the cause of action. However, the court dismissed the petition to quash Criminal Complaint No. 6544 of 2015, as the disputed facts regarding the purpose of the cheques and the alleged discharge of liability required trial evidence. The judgment clarified the legal requirement for criminal liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, emphasizing the necessity of a legally enforceable debt or liability at the time of cheque issuance. en-us Fri, 18 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Apr 2022 08:32:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421362 The court quashed Criminal Complaint No. 6543 of 2015 as the petitioners demonstrated payment within the notice period, nullifying the cause of action. However, the court dismissed the petition to quash Criminal Complaint No. 6544 of 2015, as the disputed facts regarding the purpose of the cheques and the alleged discharge of liability required trial evidence. The judgment clarified the legal requirement for criminal liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, emphasizing the necessity of a legally enforceable debt or liability at the time of cheque issuance. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421362