<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1681 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301841</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the service of notice to the Corporate Debtor sufficient, proceeding ex parte as the Corporate Debtor did not appear. The Applicant was directed to file a claim before the Insolvency Resolution Professional (IRP) and given liberty to revive the petition if the previous order was challenged or set aside. The application was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2022 21:50:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1681 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301841</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the service of notice to the Corporate Debtor sufficient, proceeding ex parte as the Corporate Debtor did not appear. The Applicant was directed to file a claim before the Insolvency Resolution Professional (IRP) and given liberty to revive the petition if the previous order was challenged or set aside. The application was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>