<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1567 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301849</link>
    <description>The Court held that the rejection of the petitioners&#039; applications seeking notional promotion to Principal Commissioners of Income Tax was unjust due to inconsistency in Tribunal decisions. The Court quashed the rejection order and directed the respondents to grant notional promotion to the petitioners within 90 days, following a similar earlier case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2022 21:50:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1567 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301849</link>
      <description>The Court held that the rejection of the petitioners&#039; applications seeking notional promotion to Principal Commissioners of Income Tax was unjust due to inconsistency in Tribunal decisions. The Court quashed the rejection order and directed the respondents to grant notional promotion to the petitioners within 90 days, following a similar earlier case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>