<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 2049 - TRIPURA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301848</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the lower courts&#039; judgments and convicted the respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The respondent was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 3,60,000 to the petitioner within six months, with a six-month imprisonment term in default. Failure to pay would result in surrender to the police or possible arrest. The court emphasized the enforceability of the debt and upheld the validity of the demand notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2022 21:50:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 2049 - TRIPURA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301848</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the lower courts&#039; judgments and convicted the respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The respondent was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 3,60,000 to the petitioner within six months, with a six-month imprisonment term in default. Failure to pay would result in surrender to the police or possible arrest. The court emphasized the enforceability of the debt and upheld the validity of the demand notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>