https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301846 Section 167 CrPC applies only during investigation, after the police forward the required papers and the accused to the Magistrate; remand ordered before FIR registration and before that statutory basis existed was held improper. The same provision also requires production of the accused for remand, either physically or through authorised video linkage, and custody cannot be authorised without such appearance. After the charge-sheet is filed, Section 167 ceases to operate and custody is then governed by Section 309; despite cognizance being delayed because sanction was pending, the post-charge-sheet custody was treated as continuing lawfully, so habeas corpus relief was refused. en-us Thu, 26 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Apr 2022 21:50:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301846 Section 167 CrPC applies only during investigation, after the police forward the required papers and the accused to the Magistrate; remand ordered before FIR registration and before that statutory basis existed was held improper. The same provision also requires production of the accused for remand, either physically or through authorised video linkage, and custody cannot be authorised without such appearance. After the charge-sheet is filed, Section 167 ceases to operate and custody is then governed by Section 309; despite cognizance being delayed because sanction was pending, the post-charge-sheet custody was treated as continuing lawfully, so habeas corpus relief was refused. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 26 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301846