https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301851 A petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an arbitrator was found time-barred because the underlying work order dated 7 April 1982 had been executed by 28 May 1986, yet the petition was filed only in 2019. The court treated the relevant dates as placing the request well beyond the limitation period, and the asserted date of knowledge in 2013 did not cure the delay. The result was that the request for appointment of an arbitrator was barred by limitation and liable to be dismissed. en-us Fri, 19 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Apr 2022 21:50:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301851 A petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an arbitrator was found time-barred because the underlying work order dated 7 April 1982 had been executed by 28 May 1986, yet the petition was filed only in 2019. The court treated the relevant dates as placing the request well beyond the limitation period, and the asserted date of knowledge in 2013 did not cure the delay. The result was that the request for appointment of an arbitrator was barred by limitation and liable to be dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301851