<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 689 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301834</link>
    <description>SC held that the twelve-year limitation under Article 136 begins from the date the decree is passed, not from its engrossment on stamp paper. The Court ruled that delay in drawing or stamping the decree does not suspend its enforceability for limitation purposes; the Indian Stamp Act does not extend or toll the Article 136 period. The HC&#039;s conclusion that the execution application was within time was set aside. The appeal was allowed and the execution application filed on 21 March 1994 was declared time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 12:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 689 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301834</link>
      <description>SC held that the twelve-year limitation under Article 136 begins from the date the decree is passed, not from its engrossment on stamp paper. The Court ruled that delay in drawing or stamping the decree does not suspend its enforceability for limitation purposes; the Indian Stamp Act does not extend or toll the Article 136 period. The HC&#039;s conclusion that the execution application was within time was set aside. The appeal was allowed and the execution application filed on 21 March 1994 was declared time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>