<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1017 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421351</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that loans and advances given for business purposes and commercial considerations do not constitute deemed dividends under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the deemed dividend addition in the hands of the assessee, based on the nature of the transactions and judicial precedents supporting the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2022 09:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1017 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421351</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that loans and advances given for business purposes and commercial considerations do not constitute deemed dividends under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the deemed dividend addition in the hands of the assessee, based on the nature of the transactions and judicial precedents supporting the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>