https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421337 Condonation of an inordinate 1332-day delay in filing a restoration application required a convincing and bona fide explanation for the entire period, and the Tribunal held that this standard was not met. The order dismissing the company petition was not ex parte, as the applicant's advocates were present on the date of dismissal, and the pleaded causes of illness and family difficulties were not accepted because the record showed pursuit of other proceedings during the same period. The application for condonation and revival of the company petition was rejected. en-us Fri, 08 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Apr 2022 08:26:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421337 Condonation of an inordinate 1332-day delay in filing a restoration application required a convincing and bona fide explanation for the entire period, and the Tribunal held that this standard was not met. The order dismissing the company petition was not ex parte, as the applicant's advocates were present on the date of dismissal, and the pleaded causes of illness and family difficulties were not accepted because the record showed pursuit of other proceedings during the same period. The application for condonation and revival of the company petition was rejected. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 08 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421337