<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 998 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , GUWAHATI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421332</link>
    <description>The Tribunal approved the replacement of the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) with a new Resolution Professional for the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of a company. Shri Purshotam Gaggar was appointed as the new Resolution Professional, replacing Shri Vakati Balasubramaniam Reddy. The decision was supported by the Committee of Creditors with 100% voting share. The outgoing IRP was directed to hand over documents promptly, and the new RP was tasked with fulfilling duties diligently. The CoC was instructed to settle dues and costs as per legal provisions and a Supreme Court judgment, concluding the process of replacing the IRP.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2022 08:25:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 998 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , GUWAHATI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421332</link>
      <description>The Tribunal approved the replacement of the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) with a new Resolution Professional for the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of a company. Shri Purshotam Gaggar was appointed as the new Resolution Professional, replacing Shri Vakati Balasubramaniam Reddy. The decision was supported by the Committee of Creditors with 100% voting share. The outgoing IRP was directed to hand over documents promptly, and the new RP was tasked with fulfilling duties diligently. The CoC was instructed to settle dues and costs as per legal provisions and a Supreme Court judgment, concluding the process of replacing the IRP.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>