https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421327 The Court concluded that the prosecution of A8 to A15 under Section 3 r/w 4 of PMLA in C.C. No.62 of 2016 was an abuse of the process of law. Consequently, the Criminal Original Petitions were allowed, and the connected miscellaneous petitions were closed. The Enforcement Directorate was given the option to consider A8 to A15 as prosecution witnesses if deemed appropriate. en-us Mon, 21 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Apr 2022 08:25:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421327 The Court concluded that the prosecution of A8 to A15 under Section 3 r/w 4 of PMLA in C.C. No.62 of 2016 was an abuse of the process of law. Consequently, the Criminal Original Petitions were allowed, and the connected miscellaneous petitions were closed. The Enforcement Directorate was given the option to consider A8 to A15 as prosecution witnesses if deemed appropriate. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 21 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421327