<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (9) TMI 8 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28679</link>
    <description>Amounts traceable to property gifted by the deceased, including rents, income and converted proceeds, were treated as property derived from the deceased and therefore disallowable under section 46(1)(a) of the Estate Duty Act. The court applied a broad construction of &quot;property derived from the deceased&quot; by reading it with the statutory definition, and treated the deposits in the sons&#039; and daughters&#039; names as within that provision despite changes in form. It further held that repayment or discharge of such disallowable debts within the statutory period attracted section 46(2) as a deeming provision, so the sums repaid or discharged were includible for estate duty purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:18:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (9) TMI 8 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28679</link>
      <description>Amounts traceable to property gifted by the deceased, including rents, income and converted proceeds, were treated as property derived from the deceased and therefore disallowable under section 46(1)(a) of the Estate Duty Act. The court applied a broad construction of &quot;property derived from the deceased&quot; by reading it with the statutory definition, and treated the deposits in the sons&#039; and daughters&#039; names as within that provision despite changes in form. It further held that repayment or discharge of such disallowable debts within the statutory period attracted section 46(2) as a deeming provision, so the sums repaid or discharged were includible for estate duty purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>