<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (11) TMI 34 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28678</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the transactions in question were not speculative under section 43(5) of the Income-tax Act, allowing the assessee to treat the amounts paid to purchasers as business losses. The court referenced various decisions supporting the view that settling claims arising from a breach does not constitute settling the contract under section 43(5). The outcome favored the assessee, ruling against the Department without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:16:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (11) TMI 34 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28678</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the transactions in question were not speculative under section 43(5) of the Income-tax Act, allowing the assessee to treat the amounts paid to purchasers as business losses. The court referenced various decisions supporting the view that settling claims arising from a breach does not constitute settling the contract under section 43(5). The outcome favored the assessee, ruling against the Department without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>