<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1836 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301811</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to allow depreciation on the estimated income from civil contract works while ensuring the computed income does not exceed the returned income. The decision was based on legal principles and precedents, emphasizing the statutory nature of depreciation allowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2022 20:56:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676746" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1836 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301811</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to allow depreciation on the estimated income from civil contract works while ensuring the computed income does not exceed the returned income. The decision was based on legal principles and precedents, emphasizing the statutory nature of depreciation allowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>