<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 978 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421312</link>
    <description>HC permitted the applicant to furnish a bank guarantee equivalent to the disputed penalty under Section 129(1)(c) of the CGST Act within one week of receipt of the order together with an application/representation. Upon presentation of the bank guarantee and application, the respondents are directed to release the detained goods and conveyance within one week. The petition is disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 14:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 978 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421312</link>
      <description>HC permitted the applicant to furnish a bank guarantee equivalent to the disputed penalty under Section 129(1)(c) of the CGST Act within one week of receipt of the order together with an application/representation. Upon presentation of the bank guarantee and application, the respondents are directed to release the detained goods and conveyance within one week. The petition is disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>