<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 967 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421301</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the addition of Rs. 21,00,000 under section 69C. It emphasized the importance of adhering to the correct provisions of the law and providing proper opportunities for the assessee to be heard. The ITAT found the referral to DVO by the AO under section 142A for section 69C matters invalid, leading to the deletion of the addition and directing the AO to delete the questioned amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2022 09:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 967 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421301</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the addition of Rs. 21,00,000 under section 69C. It emphasized the importance of adhering to the correct provisions of the law and providing proper opportunities for the assessee to be heard. The ITAT found the referral to DVO by the AO under section 142A for section 69C matters invalid, leading to the deletion of the addition and directing the AO to delete the questioned amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>