<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 965 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421299</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding additions by the Assessing Officer for unexplained expenditure, disallowance of expenditure, unexplained cash deposits, unsecured loans, debits in bank statement, and advances. Lack of documentary evidence and failure to substantiate grounds led to the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the necessity of proper documentation to verify the genuineness of transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2022 08:33:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 965 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421299</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding additions by the Assessing Officer for unexplained expenditure, disallowance of expenditure, unexplained cash deposits, unsecured loans, debits in bank statement, and advances. Lack of documentary evidence and failure to substantiate grounds led to the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the necessity of proper documentation to verify the genuineness of transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>