<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 957 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421291</link>
    <description>The appeal of the Revenue was partly allowed in ITA 1650/Ahd/2015 A.Y. 2008-09, with the deletion of additions and disallowances in various categories. The Cross objection of the assessee was allowed. Similarly, in ITA No. 1115/Ahd/2015 AY 2009-10, the appeal of the Revenue was partly allowed, and the Cross objection of the assessee was partly allowed. However, in ITA No. 3525/Ahd/2016 AY 2012-03, the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2022 08:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 957 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421291</link>
      <description>The appeal of the Revenue was partly allowed in ITA 1650/Ahd/2015 A.Y. 2008-09, with the deletion of additions and disallowances in various categories. The Cross objection of the assessee was allowed. Similarly, in ITA No. 1115/Ahd/2015 AY 2009-10, the appeal of the Revenue was partly allowed, and the Cross objection of the assessee was partly allowed. However, in ITA No. 3525/Ahd/2016 AY 2012-03, the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>