<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (1) TMI 68 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28670</link>
    <description>Customs duty drawback and excise duty refund were treated as part of export turnover because they were directly attributable to export activity and had a sufficient nexus with the export business. Profits from import entitlements were excluded because their effective source was import activity, with only an indirect connection to exports; the relevant test was the source of the income, not the mere occasion for obtaining the entitlement. The objection based on a supposed double advantage was rejected as irrelevant. Accordingly, drawback and refund amounts were includible in export turnover, but import-entitlement profits were not.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:24:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (1) TMI 68 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28670</link>
      <description>Customs duty drawback and excise duty refund were treated as part of export turnover because they were directly attributable to export activity and had a sufficient nexus with the export business. Profits from import entitlements were excluded because their effective source was import activity, with only an indirect connection to exports; the relevant test was the source of the income, not the mere occasion for obtaining the entitlement. The objection based on a supposed double advantage was rejected as irrelevant. Accordingly, drawback and refund amounts were includible in export turnover, but import-entitlement profits were not.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>