<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 942 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421276</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal found that the Section 7 Application under the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was not barred by limitation as the acknowledgments of debt by the Corporate Debtor extended the limitation period under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, set aside the Impugned Order, and remitted the matter to the Adjudicating Authority for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2022 11:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 942 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421276</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal found that the Section 7 Application under the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was not barred by limitation as the acknowledgments of debt by the Corporate Debtor extended the limitation period under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, set aside the Impugned Order, and remitted the matter to the Adjudicating Authority for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>