<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 936 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421270</link>
    <description>Voluntary disclosure under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 was held ineligible only when the declarant had already been subjected to an enquiry, investigation or audit relevant to the declared period, or had filed a return showing duty payable but unpaid. The Court found no pending enquiry, investigation or audit for the declared period as on 30.06.2019, so rejection under Section 125(1)(f) was unsustainable. It also held that a summary rejection with civil consequences could not be made without giving the declarant an opportunity to be heard. The impugned rejection was set aside and the declaration was remitted for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2023 17:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 936 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421270</link>
      <description>Voluntary disclosure under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 was held ineligible only when the declarant had already been subjected to an enquiry, investigation or audit relevant to the declared period, or had filed a return showing duty payable but unpaid. The Court found no pending enquiry, investigation or audit for the declared period as on 30.06.2019, so rejection under Section 125(1)(f) was unsustainable. It also held that a summary rejection with civil consequences could not be made without giving the declarant an opportunity to be heard. The impugned rejection was set aside and the declaration was remitted for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>