<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (5) TMI 12 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28667</link>
    <description>A statutory right to receive interest on compensation arose under the Indian Electricity Act and the Punjab Electricity Act when payment was delayed; the later umpire&#039;s award merely quantified that pre-existing obligation and did not create a new entitlement. The repeal of the Punjab Electricity Act did not extinguish accrued rights or liabilities. For tax purposes, income accrues when the right to receive it becomes enforceable, so the entire interest could not be taxed only in assessment year 1963-64. The Tribunal&#039;s treatment of the whole amount as taxable in that year was rejected, while apportionment for the relevant year was left for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:15:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (5) TMI 12 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28667</link>
      <description>A statutory right to receive interest on compensation arose under the Indian Electricity Act and the Punjab Electricity Act when payment was delayed; the later umpire&#039;s award merely quantified that pre-existing obligation and did not create a new entitlement. The repeal of the Punjab Electricity Act did not extinguish accrued rights or liabilities. For tax purposes, income accrues when the right to receive it becomes enforceable, so the entire interest could not be taxed only in assessment year 1963-64. The Tribunal&#039;s treatment of the whole amount as taxable in that year was rejected, while apportionment for the relevant year was left for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>