<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 931 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421265</link>
    <description>Documentary certificates from the supplier and manufacturer were treated as sufficient evidence that High Speed Diesel supplied from DTA had suffered Central Excise Duty and Educational Cess. Because the authorities below did not effectively examine or rebut those records, rejection of the refund claim for want of further proof was unsustainable. The refund issue was therefore resolved in favour of the assessee on the basis of unrebutted documentary evidence of duty payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 16:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 931 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421265</link>
      <description>Documentary certificates from the supplier and manufacturer were treated as sufficient evidence that High Speed Diesel supplied from DTA had suffered Central Excise Duty and Educational Cess. Because the authorities below did not effectively examine or rebut those records, rejection of the refund claim for want of further proof was unsustainable. The refund issue was therefore resolved in favour of the assessee on the basis of unrebutted documentary evidence of duty payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421265</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>