<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 907 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421241</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, ruling that the adjustment made by CPC Bengaluru was not within the jurisdiction of section 143(1)(a) of the Act. The ITAT emphasized the need for anomalies to be addressed through proper scrutiny assessment or reassessment procedures rather than adjustments under section 143(1)(a).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2022 08:32:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 907 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421241</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, ruling that the adjustment made by CPC Bengaluru was not within the jurisdiction of section 143(1)(a) of the Act. The ITAT emphasized the need for anomalies to be addressed through proper scrutiny assessment or reassessment procedures rather than adjustments under section 143(1)(a).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>