https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421235 The Tribunal quashed the order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Pr. CIT) under Section 263, holding that the Assessing Officer (AO) had conducted proper inquiries within the scope of limited scrutiny. The Tribunal found that the assessment order under Section 143(3) was not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue, thus allowing the appeal of the assessee and upholding the original assessment order. en-us Tue, 12 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Apr 2022 08:31:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421235 The Tribunal quashed the order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Pr. CIT) under Section 263, holding that the Assessing Officer (AO) had conducted proper inquiries within the scope of limited scrutiny. The Tribunal found that the assessment order under Section 143(3) was not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue, thus allowing the appeal of the assessee and upholding the original assessment order. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 12 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421235