<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 894 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421228</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed that deferred income should be recognized when services are provided, not upon receipt, in line with AS-9 and the mercantile system of accounting. Relying on precedent, including a similar case involving M/s Sun TV Network Ltd., the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. The appeal was dismissed, directing the AO to delete additions made towards deferred revenue for all relevant assessment years. The order was pronounced on 01st April 2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2022 22:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 894 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421228</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed that deferred income should be recognized when services are provided, not upon receipt, in line with AS-9 and the mercantile system of accounting. Relying on precedent, including a similar case involving M/s Sun TV Network Ltd., the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. The appeal was dismissed, directing the AO to delete additions made towards deferred revenue for all relevant assessment years. The order was pronounced on 01st April 2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421228</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>