<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 875 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421209</link>
    <description>An admitted cheque raises the statutory presumption of liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act, and that presumption is displaced only by a probable defence supported by cogent material; a bare alternate explanation without bank records or other supporting evidence is insufficient. A complaint is not rendered invalid merely because the firm is not separately arraigned where the pleadings and evidence show prosecution of the accused in their individual capacity and the necessary factual averments connect the accused to the transaction. Revisional interference is unavailable absent perversity, misreading of evidence, or jurisdictional error, and concurrent conviction and sentence were left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2022 08:30:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 875 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421209</link>
      <description>An admitted cheque raises the statutory presumption of liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act, and that presumption is displaced only by a probable defence supported by cogent material; a bare alternate explanation without bank records or other supporting evidence is insufficient. A complaint is not rendered invalid merely because the firm is not separately arraigned where the pleadings and evidence show prosecution of the accused in their individual capacity and the necessary factual averments connect the accused to the transaction. Revisional interference is unavailable absent perversity, misreading of evidence, or jurisdictional error, and concurrent conviction and sentence were left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>