https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421208 The High Court upheld the decision of the Appellate Court to remand the case to the Trial Court for consideration of the delay application. Emphasizing that the delay issue was raised for the first time on appeal, the High Court ruled that the Trial Court should have the discretion to decide on condonation of delay under Section 142(b) of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petition was dismissed, with the Trial Court instructed to resolve the matter within one year. en-us Fri, 08 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Apr 2022 08:30:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421208 The High Court upheld the decision of the Appellate Court to remand the case to the Trial Court for consideration of the delay application. Emphasizing that the delay issue was raised for the first time on appeal, the High Court ruled that the Trial Court should have the discretion to decide on condonation of delay under Section 142(b) of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petition was dismissed, with the Trial Court instructed to resolve the matter within one year. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 08 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421208