<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (2) TMI 13 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28653</link>
    <description>Under Hindu law, a Hindu undivided family need not consist of more than one male member; a family made up of a male member and his wife is sufficient to constitute an HUF even if the wife has no proprietary interest in family property and there is no living child. On that principle, the assessee&#039;s family of himself and his wife answered the description of an HUF and was correctly accepted in that status.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:36:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (2) TMI 13 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28653</link>
      <description>Under Hindu law, a Hindu undivided family need not consist of more than one male member; a family made up of a male member and his wife is sufficient to constitute an HUF even if the wife has no proprietary interest in family property and there is no living child. On that principle, the assessee&#039;s family of himself and his wife answered the description of an HUF and was correctly accepted in that status.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>