https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301772 Appointments to university teaching posts had to follow the Bihar State University Act, 1976 and the prescribed recruitment process, with sanctioned vacancies as a prerequisite. Ad hoc teachers appointed outside that framework could not claim regularisation or a blanket direction for consideration, because illegal appointments could not be validated contrary to the constitutional scheme of equality in public employment. A consent order of the High Court likewise could not override the statutory recruitment regime or compel appointments forbidden by law. The authorities were, however, directed to consider eligible teachers with requisite qualifications for sanctioned vacancies in accordance with law. en-us Fri, 18 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Apr 2022 17:20:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301772 Appointments to university teaching posts had to follow the Bihar State University Act, 1976 and the prescribed recruitment process, with sanctioned vacancies as a prerequisite. Ad hoc teachers appointed outside that framework could not claim regularisation or a blanket direction for consideration, because illegal appointments could not be validated contrary to the constitutional scheme of equality in public employment. A consent order of the High Court likewise could not override the statutory recruitment regime or compel appointments forbidden by law. The authorities were, however, directed to consider eligible teachers with requisite qualifications for sanctioned vacancies in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301772