https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301767 Displaced Kashmiri Pandit retired employees occupying government accommodation in Delhi were treated as raising constitutional and humanitarian shelter claims, not merely a routine public premises dispute. The Court applied the principle that the right to shelter forms part of dignity, life, and equality, and held that forced eviction without alternative accommodation or rehabilitation would be unjust in these exceptional circumstances. It recognised that the Government could frame a rehabilitation scheme and regulate entitlement to alternate accommodation, but that eviction could not proceed mechanically before such arrangements were made. The protection of occupation was therefore sustained pending suitable rehabilitation or alternate shelter. en-us Fri, 01 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Apr 2022 15:17:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301767 Displaced Kashmiri Pandit retired employees occupying government accommodation in Delhi were treated as raising constitutional and humanitarian shelter claims, not merely a routine public premises dispute. The Court applied the principle that the right to shelter forms part of dignity, life, and equality, and held that forced eviction without alternative accommodation or rehabilitation would be unjust in these exceptional circumstances. It recognised that the Government could frame a rehabilitation scheme and regulate entitlement to alternate accommodation, but that eviction could not proceed mechanically before such arrangements were made. The protection of occupation was therefore sustained pending suitable rehabilitation or alternate shelter. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301767