<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 866 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421200</link>
    <description>Regular bail was granted in a prosecution alleging cheating, forgery and use of forged documents in fraudulent GST-related transactions. The Court treated the case as largely documentary, noted that the chargesheet and supplementary chargesheet had already been filed, and found the applicant&#039;s alleged link to the transactions rested mainly on a mobile number and email addresses, with the mobile number transferred into the applicant&#039;s name only after the relevant transactions. In the absence of material showing flight risk or likely tampering with evidence, and with custody of about nine months already undergone, the seriousness of the ations alone was not considered sufficient to deny bail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 14:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 866 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421200</link>
      <description>Regular bail was granted in a prosecution alleging cheating, forgery and use of forged documents in fraudulent GST-related transactions. The Court treated the case as largely documentary, noted that the chargesheet and supplementary chargesheet had already been filed, and found the applicant&#039;s alleged link to the transactions rested mainly on a mobile number and email addresses, with the mobile number transferred into the applicant&#039;s name only after the relevant transactions. In the absence of material showing flight risk or likely tampering with evidence, and with custody of about nine months already undergone, the seriousness of the ations alone was not considered sufficient to deny bail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>