<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (8) TMI 32 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28649</link>
    <description>For wealth-tax assessment, a Hindu undivided family remains assessable as such unless the joint family property has been partitioned as a whole into definite portions by metes and bounds. A mere severance of status, or a tentative arrangement pending final division, does not satisfy the statutory requirement of partition for assessment purposes. As the final decree dividing the properties was passed only later, the alleged disruption did not operate during the relevant assessment years, and the HUF was liable to assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:29:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (8) TMI 32 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28649</link>
      <description>For wealth-tax assessment, a Hindu undivided family remains assessable as such unless the joint family property has been partitioned as a whole into definite portions by metes and bounds. A mere severance of status, or a tentative arrangement pending final division, does not satisfy the statutory requirement of partition for assessment purposes. As the final decree dividing the properties was passed only later, the alleged disruption did not operate during the relevant assessment years, and the HUF was liable to assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>