https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421191 The Tribunal upheld the decision of the ld. CIT(A) to confirm the addition of unexplained cash deposits for both assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15 as the assessee failed to provide satisfactory explanations or evidence for the source of the cash deposits. The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, emphasizing that the assessee did not rebut the Assessing Officer's averments and rejected the plea for one more opportunity to be heard. Consequently, the additions of unexplained cash deposits were confirmed for both years. en-us Tue, 12 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Apr 2022 08:54:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421191 The Tribunal upheld the decision of the ld. CIT(A) to confirm the addition of unexplained cash deposits for both assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15 as the assessee failed to provide satisfactory explanations or evidence for the source of the cash deposits. The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, emphasizing that the assessee did not rebut the Assessing Officer's averments and rejected the plea for one more opportunity to be heard. Consequently, the additions of unexplained cash deposits were confirmed for both years. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 12 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421191