<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (6) TMI 26 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28648</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the AAC to re-hear the appeal on interest under s. 139(1) of the I.T. Act, holding it appealable under s. 246. It upheld the constitutional validity of s. 139(1) proviso, cl. (iii)(a), rejecting claims of discrimination. The High Court partially allowed the appeal, reducing disallowances and granting relief to the appellant, while staying the order&#039;s operation for four weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:26:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (6) TMI 26 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28648</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the AAC to re-hear the appeal on interest under s. 139(1) of the I.T. Act, holding it appealable under s. 246. It upheld the constitutional validity of s. 139(1) proviso, cl. (iii)(a), rejecting claims of discrimination. The High Court partially allowed the appeal, reducing disallowances and granting relief to the appellant, while staying the order&#039;s operation for four weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>