<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 850 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421184</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 6,46,83,102/- on account of disallowance of SWAP contract loss. It ruled that the loss on SWAP contracts, recognized under Accounting Standard 11, constituted an accrued liability, not a contingent one. Citing precedents and accounting standards, the Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The order was pronounced on April 6, 2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2022 08:54:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 850 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421184</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 6,46,83,102/- on account of disallowance of SWAP contract loss. It ruled that the loss on SWAP contracts, recognized under Accounting Standard 11, constituted an accrued liability, not a contingent one. Citing precedents and accounting standards, the Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The order was pronounced on April 6, 2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>