<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 846 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421180</link>
    <description>Restriction of Property Sale Expenses: The Tribunal directed the AO to allow brokerage expenses of Rs. 2,45,000/-, partially substantiating the claim. Determination of Fair Market Value: The Tribunal revised the land&#039;s FMV to Rs. 5,700/- per cent as of 1.4.1981. Rejection of Claim of Cost of Improvement: The Tribunal upheld the rejection of Rs. 4 lakhs claim for air conditioners. Rejection of Enhanced Claim of Deduction under Section 54: The Tribunal allowed the enhanced deduction of Rs. 1,48,26,257/-, citing compliance with investment timelines. The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, instructing the AO to recalculate long-term capital gains.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2022 08:54:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 846 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421180</link>
      <description>Restriction of Property Sale Expenses: The Tribunal directed the AO to allow brokerage expenses of Rs. 2,45,000/-, partially substantiating the claim. Determination of Fair Market Value: The Tribunal revised the land&#039;s FMV to Rs. 5,700/- per cent as of 1.4.1981. Rejection of Claim of Cost of Improvement: The Tribunal upheld the rejection of Rs. 4 lakhs claim for air conditioners. Rejection of Enhanced Claim of Deduction under Section 54: The Tribunal allowed the enhanced deduction of Rs. 1,48,26,257/-, citing compliance with investment timelines. The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, instructing the AO to recalculate long-term capital gains.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>