<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 839 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421173</link>
    <description>Whether plant and machinery forming an integral part of a co-generation/power generation unit qualified for depreciation at 80% was decided by applying the principle that items which cannot function standalone and operate only as part of the integrated cogeneration system are eligible for the higher rate; following co-ordinate Bench precedent, the disallowance was rejected and the revenue&#039;s ground failed. Whether additional depreciation under s. 32(1)(iia) was allowable was decided on the basis that the statutory conditions were admittedly satisfied and the assessee was engaged in manufacture/production, and, per HC authority, no operational nexus is required between the new machinery and the existing manufactured product; the claim was upheld and the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2025 11:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 839 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421173</link>
      <description>Whether plant and machinery forming an integral part of a co-generation/power generation unit qualified for depreciation at 80% was decided by applying the principle that items which cannot function standalone and operate only as part of the integrated cogeneration system are eligible for the higher rate; following co-ordinate Bench precedent, the disallowance was rejected and the revenue&#039;s ground failed. Whether additional depreciation under s. 32(1)(iia) was allowable was decided on the basis that the statutory conditions were admittedly satisfied and the assessee was engaged in manufacture/production, and, per HC authority, no operational nexus is required between the new machinery and the existing manufactured product; the claim was upheld and the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>