<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 834 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421168</link>
    <description>Continued judicial custody pending an incomplete investigation justified bail, even though the allegations were serious and the materials collected so far indicated prima facie involvement. The Court noted that no recovery was made from the petitioner, the investigation had not been completed, and the final report had not been filed. Bail was granted to secure the investigation and prevent interference with evidence, subject to stringent conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2022 08:53:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 834 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421168</link>
      <description>Continued judicial custody pending an incomplete investigation justified bail, even though the allegations were serious and the materials collected so far indicated prima facie involvement. The Court noted that no recovery was made from the petitioner, the investigation had not been completed, and the final report had not been filed. Bail was granted to secure the investigation and prevent interference with evidence, subject to stringent conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>