https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301755 The Punjab and Haryana High Court allowed a revision petition against an order returning a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court emphasized the impact of the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015, specifying that cases must be tried in the jurisdiction where the cheque was delivered or presented for payment. Referring to legal precedents, including Dashrath Rup Singh Rathod's case, the court set aside the order and directed the trial court to proceed with the complaint in compliance with the amended provisions and established legal principles. en-us Mon, 01 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Apr 2022 20:21:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301755 The Punjab and Haryana High Court allowed a revision petition against an order returning a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court emphasized the impact of the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015, specifying that cases must be tried in the jurisdiction where the cheque was delivered or presented for payment. Referring to legal precedents, including Dashrath Rup Singh Rathod's case, the court set aside the order and directed the trial court to proceed with the complaint in compliance with the amended provisions and established legal principles. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 01 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301755