<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 824 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421158</link>
    <description>Regular bail was granted in a GST prosecution alleging fraudulent availment and passing on of input tax credit. The High Court noted that the petitioners were women, had already remained in custody for about eight months, and that the alleged offence carried a maximum sentence of five years. Without examining the merits of the allegations, it held that further detention was unwarranted in the circumstances and exercised its bail discretion in favour of release.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 15:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 824 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421158</link>
      <description>Regular bail was granted in a GST prosecution alleging fraudulent availment and passing on of input tax credit. The High Court noted that the petitioners were women, had already remained in custody for about eight months, and that the alleged offence carried a maximum sentence of five years. Without examining the merits of the allegations, it held that further detention was unwarranted in the circumstances and exercised its bail discretion in favour of release.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>