<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 818 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421152</link>
    <description>STP treated water obtained after sewage treatment was held not to be &quot;purified water&quot; for the exclusion in entry 99 of Notification No. 02/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate). Applying the ordinary meaning of &quot;purified&quot;, the authority found that water becomes purified only when it is made free from foreign or objectionable elements; although treatment removed suspended matter and pollutants, the water still contained bacteria, virus and E. coli. Reading the entry with noscitur a sociis and its apparent purpose, the ruling treated the supply as general-use industrial water rather than specialised purified water. It therefore remained eligible for exemption under entry 99.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 16:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 818 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421152</link>
      <description>STP treated water obtained after sewage treatment was held not to be &quot;purified water&quot; for the exclusion in entry 99 of Notification No. 02/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate). Applying the ordinary meaning of &quot;purified&quot;, the authority found that water becomes purified only when it is made free from foreign or objectionable elements; although treatment removed suspended matter and pollutants, the water still contained bacteria, virus and E. coli. Reading the entry with noscitur a sociis and its apparent purpose, the ruling treated the supply as general-use industrial water rather than specialised purified water. It therefore remained eligible for exemption under entry 99.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>