<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 805 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421139</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and deleting the addition of Rs. 4,56,000. It held that Section 56(2)(vii)(c) was not applicable to the allotment of shares to existing shareholders, especially when the majority of shares were held by relatives. The Tribunal emphasized the distinction between allotment and receipt of shares and the non-taxability of transactions between close relatives.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 08:09:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 805 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421139</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and deleting the addition of Rs. 4,56,000. It held that Section 56(2)(vii)(c) was not applicable to the allotment of shares to existing shareholders, especially when the majority of shares were held by relatives. The Tribunal emphasized the distinction between allotment and receipt of shares and the non-taxability of transactions between close relatives.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>