<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 790 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421124</link>
    <description>The Court directed the 3rd respondent to decide on the petitioner&#039;s Export Obligation Discharge Certificate (EODC) application within four weeks. Once issued, the petitioner can submit it to Customs, and the impugned order to invoke the Bank guarantee is stayed until then. The Court emphasized timely decision-making to prevent penalizing the petitioner for delays.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 08:08:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 790 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421124</link>
      <description>The Court directed the 3rd respondent to decide on the petitioner&#039;s Export Obligation Discharge Certificate (EODC) application within four weeks. Once issued, the petitioner can submit it to Customs, and the impugned order to invoke the Bank guarantee is stayed until then. The Court emphasized timely decision-making to prevent penalizing the petitioner for delays.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>