https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421105 The appeals were partly allowed by the Member (Judicial) of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad. Penalties imposed under Rule 26 on two appellants for Rs. One lakh each were reduced to Rs. 50,000 each. The penalties were based on findings in the same Order-in-Appeal regarding clandestine removal of excisable goods. The reduction in penalties was attributed to the roles of the appellants in the activities. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of the evidence and submissions, ultimately resulting in a reduction of penalties for both appellants. en-us Tue, 12 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Apr 2022 08:07:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421105 The appeals were partly allowed by the Member (Judicial) of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad. Penalties imposed under Rule 26 on two appellants for Rs. One lakh each were reduced to Rs. 50,000 each. The penalties were based on findings in the same Order-in-Appeal regarding clandestine removal of excisable goods. The reduction in penalties was attributed to the roles of the appellants in the activities. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of the evidence and submissions, ultimately resulting in a reduction of penalties for both appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 12 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421105