https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421099 In an NDPS bail matter, the Delhi High Court applied the rigours of Section 37 and declined regular bail where the record showed alleged recovery of controlled substances, supporting forensic material, and adverse antecedents, including alleged involvement in other NDPS cases while on bail. The Court held that the seriousness of the recovery and investigative material could not be ignored at the pre-trial stage, and that prolonged incarceration by itself was not enough to displace the statutory restrictions. Challenges to the tenancy link, the panchnama, and the admissibility or reliability of the Section 67 statement were treated as issues for trial. Bail was therefore refused. en-us Mon, 11 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Apr 2022 08:07:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421099 In an NDPS bail matter, the Delhi High Court applied the rigours of Section 37 and declined regular bail where the record showed alleged recovery of controlled substances, supporting forensic material, and adverse antecedents, including alleged involvement in other NDPS cases while on bail. The Court held that the seriousness of the recovery and investigative material could not be ignored at the pre-trial stage, and that prolonged incarceration by itself was not enough to displace the statutory restrictions. Challenges to the tenancy link, the panchnama, and the admissibility or reliability of the Section 67 statement were treated as issues for trial. Bail was therefore refused. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421099