<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 759 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421093</link>
    <description>Amended anti-dumping rules do not require an absolute exclusion of producers related to exporters or importers, or producers who themselves import the dumped article, from the definition of domestic industry. The designated authority may, on a case-specific basis, include such producers where the facts justify it, subject to limited discretion. The non-injurious price under the anti-dumping framework must be computed in Indian Rupees from domestic cost data, with any later conversion into United States Dollars made only for duty application. The review modified the earlier observations on both issues and left the remaining judgment undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 08:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 759 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421093</link>
      <description>Amended anti-dumping rules do not require an absolute exclusion of producers related to exporters or importers, or producers who themselves import the dumped article, from the definition of domestic industry. The designated authority may, on a case-specific basis, include such producers where the facts justify it, subject to limited discretion. The non-injurious price under the anti-dumping framework must be computed in Indian Rupees from domestic cost data, with any later conversion into United States Dollars made only for duty application. The review modified the earlier observations on both issues and left the remaining judgment undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>