<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 757 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421091</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeals with consequential relief to the appellants. The decision emphasized the necessity of timely service of notices, the requirement for corroborative evidence in cases of clandestine removal, and the proper examination and cross-examination of statements used as evidence. The confiscation and penalties were found to be unjustified in the absence of concrete evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 08:06:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 757 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421091</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeals with consequential relief to the appellants. The decision emphasized the necessity of timely service of notices, the requirement for corroborative evidence in cases of clandestine removal, and the proper examination and cross-examination of statements used as evidence. The confiscation and penalties were found to be unjustified in the absence of concrete evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>