https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421090 In a Section 138 prosecution, limitation was computed by excluding the day on which the cause of action arose, and the complaint was found to be within time. The cheque, dishonour for insufficient funds, notice, and non-payment were proved from the record, so the statutory presumption under Section 139 remained unrebutted. The accused failed to produce credible defence evidence sufficient to displace the presumption of legally enforceable debt, and the concurrent findings of conviction and sentence were left undisturbed. en-us Fri, 01 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Apr 2022 08:06:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421090 In a Section 138 prosecution, limitation was computed by excluding the day on which the cause of action arose, and the complaint was found to be within time. The cheque, dishonour for insufficient funds, notice, and non-payment were proved from the record, so the statutory presumption under Section 139 remained unrebutted. The accused failed to produce credible defence evidence sufficient to displace the presumption of legally enforceable debt, and the concurrent findings of conviction and sentence were left undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421090