https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301740 For a non-international commercial arbitration, an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 lies before the principal civil court of original jurisdiction in the district. The definition of "Court" in Section 2(e) of the Arbitration Act prevails, and the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 does not displace that forum where the Arbitration Act itself specifies jurisdiction. The Gujarat High Court therefore held that the District Court retained jurisdiction, set aside the order returning the Section 9 application, and restored the proceedings for decision on merits. en-us Mon, 11 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Apr 2022 08:06:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301740 For a non-international commercial arbitration, an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 lies before the principal civil court of original jurisdiction in the district. The definition of "Court" in Section 2(e) of the Arbitration Act prevails, and the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 does not displace that forum where the Arbitration Act itself specifies jurisdiction. The Gujarat High Court therefore held that the District Court retained jurisdiction, set aside the order returning the Section 9 application, and restored the proceedings for decision on merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301740